
Rick Stansbury (AP photo)
An interesting sidelight to this John Calipari-Rick Stansbury debate over the Enes Kanter-Dee Bost comparison comes in the statement Calipari put on CoachCal.com.
“I love what the NCAA did with Dee Bost. Dee Bost decided to put his name in the NBA draft; stayed in the Draft – meaning he was then a professional and could not come back and be an amateur. Yet, they looked at it, and said, wait a minute, common sense says, we’re going to let him play, sit him out some games and let him play.”
So is Calipari admitting that Kanter was a professional when he played on his club team in Turkey?
You almost have to wonder if Kentucky knows something here, that the NCAA is not going to just rule Kanter eligible. Given Cal’s comments about how the NCAA is not working against UK, but with UK, it’s almost as if the coach is employing a be-nice strategy in hopes that the NCAA takes a sympathetic look at Kanter’s situation. And Kentucky’s.
On the one hand, Stansbury’s implication that Kentucky gets special treatment – “Everybody is probably waiting to see (if) Kentucky gets something, is it because, with Kentucky, something’s maybe different than another school.” – is consistent with the Mississippi State coach’s whiny, and tired, persona.
On the other hand, not sure I see the Bost/Kanter comparison. Bost never played a game for a professional team. He put his name in the draft, waited past the deadline, didn’t get drafted, then wanted to come back. It’s similar to what former UK center Randolph Morris did a few years back. In that case, the NCAA allowed Morris to return to the Cats, but only after a 14-game suspension. And only after UK appealed the original one-year suspension. (At the time, Dick Vitale wrote, “Santa Claus came early to Lexington . . .”)
Cal is absolutely correct on one thing. The NCAA has a tough decision to make, one that will have long-range affects on young Europeans who want to come to the United States to play college basketball.