Daily Randoms for a Friday:
Can’t say that I agree with my friend and colleague Mark Story, who wrote for the H-L this morning that Kentucky football would be getting ahead of itself if it tried to toughen up its non-conference schedule.
Not saying that that the Cats should schedule Texas every year. But considering the increasing ticket costs, and K-Fund costs, it wouldn’t hurt from a political standpoint for the UK administration to toss in a Duke, or a Wake Forest, or an Illinois, or even a Clemson every couple of years. The football ticket-holders I speak to are increasingly bored with the steady diet of Western Kentucky, Akron, Louisiana-Monroe, Charleston Southern, etc.
And do you really want a bored fan base?
Think outsiders haven’t caught on to what the Cats are doing in terms of scheduling?
Consider this from FanHouse’s Clay Travis:
Sneakily, the Kentucky Wildcats will advance to 3-0 with a win over another mediocre team. Kentucky has been to four consecutive bowl games — a huge feat when you consider that the team had been to only 10 bowl games in its history before this run — to a great degree because the Wildcats have mastered the art of scheduling. Namely, Kentucky plays three teams every year that are absolutely awful opponents, guaranteed wins.
Start with three wins, hope you can handle Louisville, and then you just have to go 2-6 in the SEC to be bowl eligible. Toss in a guaranteed yearly matchup with Mississippi State — last SEC title 1941 — and you’ve got a recipe for decent success. It’s how, despite never even reaching .500 in SEC play in any of these four seasons, Kentucky has managed to win three of its last four bowl games.
Continue reading ‘How about toughening the schedule just a bit?’










