Good e-mail from Steve from Lexington on my column this morning about judging Kentucky’s worth versus a down year in the SEC.
Here’s an excerpt:
You said the same thing in today’s column that my wife and I discussed last night, but other than three or four good teams in the Big East or the ACC, there are not that many great teams. Teams that were great a month ago, are struggling. Georgetown cannot get a win. Neither can Notre Dame. Minnesota has lost two in a row, and struggled yesterday to beat a team that is worse than any team in the SEC. Why is everyone picking on the SEC? Is it because the PAC 10 games are so late that no one can watch them? UCLA has fallen since last year almost as much as Memphis.
The Cats will be there in the end IF Pat Pat’s finger heals, they continue to play good defense, there are no injuries, and Miller and Liggins turn into the players they can become. Like Jody said, it is time for them to become sophomores. I noticed you did not mention Florida as a potentially good team. They are a miracle away from twelve consecutive wins. Either you or Mark said they would be going down the tube about now. Not true yet. True, most of those are SEC wins, but Mississippi State can play when they show up. Same is true for LSU, who seems to take a game off every now and then. Still, I have to agree that it looks doubtful that any SEC team will make the Sweet Sixteen this year.
A couple more things. Don’t pick on Xavier. No one ever gives X or Butler any respect, and all either of them do is keep on winning, even in the NCAA Tournament. I get tired of people picking on certain schools and conferences. It still irks me when people refuse to give VMI some credit. Jerry did not like it when I told him VMI was better than seventh in their conference. He said the coaches said that is where they would end up. Is that the same coaches that first-place VMI has been beating all year? If I can tell that Jody Meeks and VMI were vastly underrated in November and December, and said so at that time, why can’t those who are paid to study such things know this? I am talking about those misguided souls all across the country. Remind Jerry where the VMI team that he was berating early in the year is still number one in their conference, not seventh.
With all that said, I still think the three of you do a great job of reporting on UK basketball, the only sport I read about, and one of only three reasons why I continue to subscribe to the LHL.
Reply: Steve makes an excellent point. There isn’t great depth when it comes to great teams this year. And I didn’t mean to pick on Xavier. I should have given it more credit for the win at LSU. In fact, if UK had an opening right now, Sean Miller would be at or near the top of my get list. And we are all thankful for Herald-Leader subscribers, especially in these tough economic times.
Meanwhile, Beth wrote:
I noticed that you overlooked Mississippi State when discussing the pathetic condition of the majority of SEC conference schools. Was there a reason for this? Could it have anything to do with the loses UK has had against MSU in recent years? Just curious. It’s also curious that UK, regardless of how well or poorly they played, seems to be the only SEC team really covered in the H-L. By the way, the Cats have my loyalties until they mess with the Dawgs and then all bets are off!
Reply: Beth is right. I should have given MSU more props. The Bulldogs do have non-conference losses to San Diego, Charlotte and Texas Tech, but Rick Stansbury’s club has made an impact in conference play.